Help wanted -5-point Likert or 10-point numerical?

May 26, 2010 at 7:36 pm 7 comments

Here’s one for you our readers.

Benchpoint is currently designing a survey for a client. Most of the questions have 5-point Likert scales:

Very satisfied
Satisfied
Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied
Slightly dissatisfied
Very dissatisfied

However the client wishes to have one question with a 10 point numerical scale where 9 is extremely satisfied and 0 is extremely dissatisfied.

We say we should stick to the same scale throughout the survey, and that a 5-point descriptive scale is better that a 10-point numerical scale.

What do our readers think?

Entry filed under: Evaluation tools (surveys, interviews..), General. Tags: .

Web analytics and communications evaluation Researching campaign messages – wrinkles or cancer?

7 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Elena Harman  |  May 26, 2010 at 7:51 pm

    The Likert Scale should absolutely stay consistent throughout the survey. To change it on one question would be confusing to respondents. I agree that a 5-point scale is preferable over a 10-point scale, and if they really want more than 5 choices, 7-point Likert scales are the prefered method for pre-/post-testing and provide an opportinity for increase differentiation of responses.

    Reply
  • 2. Glenn  |  May 26, 2010 at 8:21 pm

    Thanks Elena, I agree with you. The scale should stay consistent throughout the survey, it makes it clearer for the respondent – and allows for more comparable analysis. I think 7 points is the maximum. Most studies show that people find it difficult with scales greater than 7.
    Glenn

    Reply
  • 3. mirely  |  May 27, 2010 at 7:50 am

    definetely agree. consistency all the way. maybe benchpoint could provide the client with some references to help them understand why this is important…

    glenn: enjoy your site very much

    Reply
  • 4. Richard Gaunt  |  May 27, 2010 at 1:21 pm

    I am very grateful to everyone for taking the time to comment. Very helpful.

    Reply
  • 5. Glenn  |  May 30, 2010 at 7:03 pm

    Thanks also for your comments on the blog!
    Glenn

    Reply
  • 6. Marc Levasseur  |  June 7, 2010 at 10:38 pm

    10 is more nuanced than 5. Of course you get more precise with the five possible answers but you give more room to respondents for a real appreciation with the 10 possibilities. As for the unity of methods…well hard to tell, this could be a challenge to calculate accurately with two different scales

    Reply
  • 7. Richard Gaunt  |  June 8, 2010 at 9:07 am

    Ten or Five?
    Marc has a point.
    However it is quite complex to use words to describe 10 nuances of satisfaction/dissatisfaction.
    And if you use a numerical scale, then you have to allow for individual bias. One person’s 7 may be another person’s 9.
    At the reporting stage there would be an strong incentive (time, complexity) to take all those who answered 7 or more as “satisfied”, in which case you would have been better off with a 5-point Likert scale in the first place.
    Does anyone have an example where a ten-point scale has actually made a positve differnence when reporting results, or implementing change as a result of a survey?

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 867 other followers

Categories

Feeds


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 867 other followers

%d bloggers like this: