The problem with ROI
May 21, 2007 at 8:08 pm 2 comments
I’ve written previously about Return on Investment (ROI) and particularly its application to blogging (which I consider as flawed).
At a broader level, there has been discussion for some time on ROI for public relations/communications programmes. Tom Watson of the dummyspit blog has written about this issue and the difficulty of applying what is essentially a financial concept to a non-financial activity, as is the case for marketing and PR.
As he states.
“For marketers, the application of ROI limits their role to sales support and ignores the brand and reputational issues. In PR, I’ve long argued that the use of business language is a fundamental sign of insecurity and a lack of confidence. It seems that marketing has the same affliction.”
Glenn
Entry filed under: Communication evaluation, PR evaluation.
1. Turning News Into Knowledge » Blog Archive » What constitutes ROI? | May 29, 2007 at 1:39 am
[…] blog posting, The problem with ROI, would like to see more of an emphasis on brand and reputation […]
2. What constitutes ROI? | MediaMiser | May 22, 2013 at 8:51 pm
[…] blog posting, The problem with ROI, would like to see more of an emphasis on brand and reputation […]