New resource: No Royal Road: Finding and Following the Natural Pathways in Advocacy Evaluation

August 9, 2019 at 2:24 pm 1 comment

adv_eva

Jim Coe and Rhonda Schlangen have published a very interesting publication on advocacy evaluation.

The highlight six factors that they believe should change for monitoring and evaluation of advocacy:

1. Better factor in uncertainty.

2. Plan for unpredictability.

3. Redefine contribution as combinational and dispositional.

4. Parse outcomes and their significance.

5. Break down barriers to engaging advocates in monitoring and evaluation.

6. Think differently about how we evaluate more transformational advocacy.

Learn more about the publication>>

Entry filed under: Advocacy evaluation, Campaign evaluation.

Sketches from communication evaluation summit 1 day workshop in Bern: The politics of evaluation; 2 November 2019

1 Comment Add your own

  • 1. Sergey  |  August 10, 2019 at 6:36 am

    Thanks you helpful yes.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 1,129 other followers

Categories

Feeds


%d bloggers like this: