Help wanted -5-point Likert or 10-point numerical?

May 26, 2010 at 7:36 pm 7 comments

Here’s one for you our readers.

Benchpoint is currently designing a survey for a client. Most of the questions have 5-point Likert scales:

Very satisfied
Satisfied
Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied
Slightly dissatisfied
Very dissatisfied

However the client wishes to have one question with a 10 point numerical scale where 9 is extremely satisfied and 0 is extremely dissatisfied.

We say we should stick to the same scale throughout the survey, and that a 5-point descriptive scale is better that a 10-point numerical scale.

What do our readers think?

Entry filed under: Evaluation tools (surveys, interviews..), General. Tags: .

Web analytics and communications evaluation Researching campaign messages – wrinkles or cancer?

7 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Elena Harman  |  May 26, 2010 at 7:51 pm

    The Likert Scale should absolutely stay consistent throughout the survey. To change it on one question would be confusing to respondents. I agree that a 5-point scale is preferable over a 10-point scale, and if they really want more than 5 choices, 7-point Likert scales are the prefered method for pre-/post-testing and provide an opportinity for increase differentiation of responses.

    Reply
  • 2. Glenn  |  May 26, 2010 at 8:21 pm

    Thanks Elena, I agree with you. The scale should stay consistent throughout the survey, it makes it clearer for the respondent – and allows for more comparable analysis. I think 7 points is the maximum. Most studies show that people find it difficult with scales greater than 7.
    Glenn

    Reply
  • 3. mirely  |  May 27, 2010 at 7:50 am

    definetely agree. consistency all the way. maybe benchpoint could provide the client with some references to help them understand why this is important…

    glenn: enjoy your site very much

    Reply
  • 4. Richard Gaunt  |  May 27, 2010 at 1:21 pm

    I am very grateful to everyone for taking the time to comment. Very helpful.

    Reply
  • 5. Glenn  |  May 30, 2010 at 7:03 pm

    Thanks also for your comments on the blog!
    Glenn

    Reply
  • 6. Marc Levasseur  |  June 7, 2010 at 10:38 pm

    10 is more nuanced than 5. Of course you get more precise with the five possible answers but you give more room to respondents for a real appreciation with the 10 possibilities. As for the unity of methods…well hard to tell, this could be a challenge to calculate accurately with two different scales

    Reply
  • 7. Richard Gaunt  |  June 8, 2010 at 9:07 am

    Ten or Five?
    Marc has a point.
    However it is quite complex to use words to describe 10 nuances of satisfaction/dissatisfaction.
    And if you use a numerical scale, then you have to allow for individual bias. One person’s 7 may be another person’s 9.
    At the reporting stage there would be an strong incentive (time, complexity) to take all those who answered 7 or more as “satisfied”, in which case you would have been better off with a 5-point Likert scale in the first place.
    Does anyone have an example where a ten-point scale has actually made a positve differnence when reporting results, or implementing change as a result of a survey?

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 1,061 other followers

Categories

Feeds


%d bloggers like this: