Posts filed under ‘Campaign evaluation’

My PhD on communication evaluation in 10 slides…

Earlier this year I had the opportunity to present the findings of my PhD in 30 minutes (!) to the Geneva Communicators Network. I titled my presentation “communication evaluation: challenges and complexities” – and you can view it below – it’s a very summarised version of my PhD! If you are really keen, you can view the full PhD thesis here.

 

November 22, 2016 at 10:47 am Leave a comment

Tracking Use of Campaign Evaluation Findings

This week I made a presentation at the European Evaluation Society conference on a tracking study on the use of campaign evaluation (that I had carried out).  For those interested in this subject, my slides are here for your consumption!

September 29, 2016 at 12:05 pm Leave a comment

communication evaluation event in Zurich – 28 April 2016

For any readers in the Zurich, Switzerland area, I will be giving a presentation for the EMScom Alumni Association  (of which I am an alumni of..) on communication evaluation;  here is a short description:

Evaluation of communication activities is consistently named as one of the top concerns of communication professionals. Yet paradoxically not even half reportedly undertake any evaluation. Drawing from his recent PhD studies and over a decade of experience in evaluating communication campaigns and programmes, Glenn O’Neil will set out the challenges and complexities of evaluation and offer insights into solutions and approaches to ensure that evaluation brings value to communication professionals and their organisation

Thursday, April 28, 2016, 18h30-21h00
Widder Hotel, Zürich
Cost: 50 CHF (free for EMScom alumni)

Hope to see some of you there! Further information >>

Register also by email: emscomalumni@usi.ch

Glenn

April 6, 2016 at 4:18 pm Leave a comment

Beyond online vanity metrics

Here is a very interesting study (pdf) from the Mobilisation Lab on what counts and doesn’t for online metrics and campaigns.

The study looks at what they call “vanity metrics” for online campaigns that they define as “data that are easily manipulated, are biased toward the short-term, often paint a rosy picture of program success, or do not help campaigners make wise strategic decisions”. Examples of vanity metrics include: number of petition signatures; web traffic, number of “opens” (of emails I guess).

So what do they recommend campaigns should be measuring?

They have plenty of good suggestions and insights. Here are some of the metrics they mentioned that could be more significant (and possible to measure online):

  • Monthly members returning for action
  • Actions per member (rather than size of lists)
  • Number of members actively part of a campaign

View the study here (pdf)>>

July 28, 2015 at 8:28 am 1 comment

10 elements of success for advocacy

The US-based Media Impact Funders have produced a ten point list on elements of success for policy change (what I’ve labeled “advocacy”), as reproduced below in this post.

Although it is looking from a US perspective of influence on policy through advocacy, what struck me was that many of the points are relevant to advocacy done globally or in other countries/regions.  For example:

Point 1: Solutions – when evaluating advocacy initiatives and talking with policy-makers, a common complaint I have heard is that advocacy is not “solution focused”, i.e. it makes valid points about the given issues (that often policy-makers are also aware of) but don’t necessarily put forward possible solutions to these issues.

Point 3: Agility – the ability to be flexible is so important – to take advantage of opportunities that arise, that were not necessarily included in the original advocacy plan. That I saw recently in an evaluation I carried out for Oxfam on global development policy – where they had enough flexibility to move resources as the issues peaked and new opportunities emerged.

Point 5: Humanity – often advocacy focuses on the “facts” but what can also make an impact is the “human factor”. One effective example of this was in the creation of the Arms Trade Treaty where state representatives drafting the treaty were directly confronted by survivors of armed violence; certainly bringing a human face to the dry legalistic treaty process and language.

 

 

July 14, 2015 at 11:28 am 1 comment

Monitoring and Evaluating Advocacy toolkit

I recently came across this resource from UNICEF, which is their  guide to monitoring and evaluating advocacy (pdf).  It’s a companion to their larger advocacy toolkit (pdf).

It’s a very comprehensive guide and I’d add it to my previous list of best resources for advocacy evaluation>>

May 21, 2015 at 6:20 am Leave a comment

Two New Advocacy Evaluation Tools

Here are two new advocacy evaluation tools from the Center for Evaluation Innovation:

The Advocacy Strategy Framework (pdf): presents a simple one-page tool for thinking about theories of change that underlie policy advocacy strategies. Check out the “interim outcomes and indicators” on the last page – very good range of advocacy outcomes/indicators.

Four Tools for Assessing Grantee Contribution to Advocacy Efforts (pdf): offers funders practical guidance on how to assess a grantee’s contribution to advocacy outcomes.The four tools include:
1. A question bank
2. Structured grantee reporting
3. An external partner interview guide
4. Contribution analysis

 

April 1, 2015 at 4:49 pm 1 comment

Older Posts Newer Posts


Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 1,127 other followers

Categories

Feeds